Powered by
  Local Interest

    Home

  Political
    News   Outdoors
    Sports   People
    Obituaries   Classifieds
    Editorial   Letters to Editor
    Pulse   Schools
    Legals  
  Features
    Business   NIE
    Religion   Dispatch
    Seniors   TV Listings
    Stocks   For Kids
    Movies   Pets
  Peninsula Guide
    Advertising   Circulation
    Forms   Archives
    Exploring   About Us
    Churches  

 Deadhorse
 Fairbanks
 Anchorage
10° Kenai
 Homer
 Juneau
April
S M T W T F S
      1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
   


Our Stories
Web
Yellow Pages
Stocks
Classifieds

 

 

 
Web posted Friday, October 20, 2000


Latest dispute over Shroud of Turin authenticity: plant pollen


WASHINGTON (AP) -- An article in Biblical Archaeology Review disputes claims that plant pollen embedded in the Shroud of Turin supports belief in the Italian relic as the actual burial cloth of Jesus Christ.

Author Vaughn M. Bryant Jr., director of the pollen laboratory at Texas A&M University, says he and ''most other serious scientists'' will remain unconvinced until new pollen samples from the cloth are studied under stricter conditions.

In 1973 and 1978 the late Max Frei, director of the police laboratory in Zurich, Switzerland, collected pollen grains embedded in the cloth, using a dozen pieces of sticky tape. He reported the presence of 54 plant species that occur only in Israel and Turkey.

Last year the Missouri Botanical Garden in St. Louis published ''Flora of the Shroud of Turin,'' written by four U.S. and Israeli scientists who re-examined Frei's evidence and largely supported his conclusions.

However, Bryant writes that all the tests were inadequate because they used a conventional microscope, not a scanning electron microscope or transmission electron microscope that would provide more precise identifications of pollen species. He says Frei should have applied chemicals to remove surface coatings that obscure details of the pollen.

Bryant is also unimpressed by most of the faint plant images on the shroud, which believers think were somehow left by burial flowers.

Besides the botanical dispute, radiocarbon tests have dated the relic between A.D. 1272 and 1390, but believers contend those samples were contaminated and say authenticity remains possible.

------

On the Net:

Biblical Archaeology Review: www.bib-arch.org


Discuss this story in our Discussion Forum
       
E-mail this Story
a friend
E-mail a message
to the editor
Read our paper
on your PDA
Have our Headlines
e-mailed to you
Comments or questions?
For questions about the website contact the web master at Kenai Peninsula Online

Box 3009
Kenai, AK 99611
907-283-7551
Copyrighted by Peninsula Clarion, a Division of Morris Communications
Privacy and terms of use.